又一家VPS:Host1Plus

杂谈 9394 次围观 19 次吐槽

Host1Plus,成立于 2008 年,是一家英国的著名 IDC,旗下拥有的业务有虚拟主机,VPS,独立服务器,SEO 主机,域名注册,SSL 等。在巴西、德国、立陶宛、新加坡、南非、荷兰、英国、美国都有其服务器。最早提供免费虚拟主机的 Host1Free 也是这家的。
其 VPS 业务的服务器位于美国洛杉矶、美国芝加哥、德国法兰克福、巴西圣保罗、南非约翰内斯堡。本次评测为美国洛杉矶的 VPS ,是 Host1Plus 友情支持的一款 Gold 套餐。

首先看一下 Gold 套餐的配置:
2GB RAM
1GB Swap
2x vCPU
40GB HDD+SSD space
2000GB transfer
50Mbps uplink
1x IPv4
OpenVZ

1、CPU 和内存
CPU model :  Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2640 v2 @ 2.00GHz
Number of cores : 2
CPU frequency :  2000.070 MHz
Total amount of RAM : 2048 MB
Total amount of Swap : 1024 MB

2、硬盘

[root@la ~]# df -ah
Filesystem         Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/ploop28697p1   40G  2.6G   35G   7% /
proc                  0     0     0    - /proc
sysfs                 0     0     0    - /sys
none               1.0G  4.0K  1.0G   1% /dev
none                  0     0     0    - /dev/pts
none               1.0G     0  1.0G   0% /dev/shm
none                  0     0     0    - /proc/sys/fs/binfmt_misc

3、I/O

[root@la ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync 
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 14.6265 s, 73.4 MB/s

[root@la ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync 
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 7.98519 s, 134 MB/s

[root@la ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync 
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 1.53575 s, 699 MB/s

[root@la ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync 
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 1.68398 s, 638 MB/s

点评:可以看到用 SSD 作为缓存的效果还是不错的。

4、Network

下载速度:

[root@la ~]# wget http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
--2015-05-26 11:08:40--  http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
Resolving cachefly.cachefly.net... 205.234.175.175
Connecting to cachefly.cachefly.net|205.234.175.175|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: `100mb.test'

100%[======================================>] 104,857,600 6.02M/s   in 17s

2015-05-26 11:08:56 (6.00 MB/s) - `100mb.test' saved [104857600/104857600]

上传速度:

[root@v1 ~]# wget http://191.101.**.**/100mb.test
--2015-05-26 11:22:25--  http://191.101.**.**/100mb.test
Connecting to 191.101.**.**:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 104857600 (100M)
Saving to: `100mb.test'

100%[======================================>] 104,857,600 5.57M/s   in 17s

2015-05-26 11:22:43 (5.78 MB/s) - `100mb.test' saved [104857600/104857600]

点评:测试上传速度时,我用的是洛杉矶的另一个 VPS 来下载的,可以看出网络确实是 50Mbps 的,上传和下载都一样。

5、综合测试

[root@la ~]# wget http://freevps.us/downloads/bench.sh -O - -o /dev/null | bash
CPU model :  Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2640 v2 @ 2.00GHz
Number of cores : 2
CPU frequency :  2000.070 MHz
Total amount of ram : 2048 MB
Total amount of swap : 1024 MB
System uptime :   5 days, 14:31,       
Download speed from CacheFly: 5.98MB/s 
Download speed from Coloat, Atlanta GA: 3.70MB/s 
Download speed from Softlayer, Dallas, TX: 5.24MB/s 
Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 5.74MB/s 
Download speed from i3d.net, Rotterdam, NL: 3.51MB/s
Download speed from Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL: 5.97MB/s 
Download speed from Softlayer, Singapore: 5.20MB/s 
Download speed from Softlayer, Seattle, WA: 5.96MB/s 
Download speed from Softlayer, San Jose, CA: 5.76MB/s 
Download speed from Softlayer, Washington, DC: 4.86MB/s 
I/O speed :  662 MB/s

6、UnixBench

[root@la ~]# wget https://teddysun.com/wp-content/uploads/unixbench.sh
[root@la ~]# chmod +x unixbench.sh
[root@la ~]# ./unixbench.sh

========================================================================
   BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)

   System: teddysun.com: GNU/Linux
   OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.32-042stab108.1 -- #1 SMP Thu Apr 23 19:17:11 MSK 2015
   Machine: x86_64 (x86_64)
   Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8")
   CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2640 v2 @ 2.00GHz (4000.1 bogomips)
          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
   CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2640 v2 @ 2.00GHz (4000.1 bogomips)
          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
   21:21:39 up 36 min,  1 user,  load average: 0.15, 0.03, 0.01; runlevel 3

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Wed May 20 2015 21:21:39 - 21:49:33
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       22472043.9 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     2422.0 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               2187.5 lps   (29.6 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        382687.0 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          111918.4 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       1016263.9 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                              873521.9 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                 142805.9 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                               6923.2 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   3546.6 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                    822.2 lpm   (59.8 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                        1338852.2 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   22472043.9   1925.6
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       2422.0    440.4
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       2187.5    508.7
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     382687.0    966.4
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     111918.4    676.2
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    1016263.9   1752.2
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0     873521.9    702.2
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     142805.9    357.0
Process Creation                                126.0       6923.2    549.5
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       3546.6    836.5
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0        822.2   1370.3
System Call Overhead                          15000.0    1338852.2    892.6
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                         800.9

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Wed May 20 2015 21:49:33 - 22:17:29
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       44781176.3 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     4836.1 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               5545.7 lps   (29.7 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        518848.0 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          138019.5 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       1560788.0 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                             1713998.2 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                 313428.3 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                              12601.5 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   6381.3 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                    898.1 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                        2163686.4 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   44781176.3   3837.3
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       4836.1    879.3
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       5545.7   1289.7
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     518848.0   1310.2
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     138019.5    834.0
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    1560788.0   2691.0
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    1713998.2   1377.8
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     313428.3    783.6
Process Creation                                126.0      12601.5   1000.1
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       6381.3   1505.0
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0        898.1   1496.8
System Call Overhead                          15000.0    2163686.4   1442.5
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                        1373.0

7、Ping

点评:traceroute 后发现,中国电信是走 pccw,中国联通是走 ntt,所以总体上是对电信比较友好。

8、支付方式

点评:支持支付宝付款,方便没有信用卡的人。

小结:
老牌主机商,经验丰富,购买 VPS 时可自由定制。
还有冷门国家的 VPS 可选,比如巴西和南非。
洛杉矶对于国内网络比较友好,适合做站。

转载请注明:秋水逸冰 » 又一家VPS:Host1Plus

发表评论
取消评论
  • 昵称 (必填)
  • 邮箱 (必填)
  • 网址
表情

已有评论 (19)

  1. 不错
    hello8个月前 (2016-06-18)回复
  2. Host1Plus好像是我以前刚接触的第一家免费vps的服务商
    sky1701年前 (2016-02-12)回复
  3. 求推荐部分性价比高的VPS,搭建SS.
    lxj123281年前 (2015-10-23)回复
    • AWS EC2可以建SS服务器,还免费
      Omg1年前 (2015-12-12)回复
      • 不太好弄吧 容易被扣钱
        omg11个月前 (2016-04-02)回复
  4. 又是不错的推荐
    xuzizzz1年前 (2015-09-14)回复
  5. banwagon哪个机房对电信好点
    DD2年前 (2015-06-18)回复
  6. 不折腾了,现在用linode的东京~
    灵尘子2年前 (2015-06-08)回复
  7. 试了下搭建SS,速度基本和搬瓦工差不多,甚至比搬瓦工还慢点,价格比搬瓦工贵一倍,其实没啥意义啊....
    abc2年前 (2015-05-31)回复
    • 因为物理地址是在洛杉矶,所以速度也就是那样了。价格确实是比较高,所以一般要等他们出优惠码才有性价比。
      秋水逸冰2年前 (2015-06-01)回复
  8. 看了你的介绍后就买了,付完款发现连https://manage.host1plus.com/ 这个页面都打不开,以为被墙了,代理出去也打不开....
    abc2年前 (2015-05-31)回复
  9. traceroute 后发现,中国电信是走 pccw,中国联通是走 ntt,所以总体上是对电信比较友好?这是怎么看出来对电信比较友好?表示不太理解
    wzc0x02年前 (2015-05-28)回复
    • pccw 是香港电信盈科,属于优质线路。
      秋水逸冰2年前 (2015-05-28)回复
      • 了解了,谢谢
        wzc0x02年前 (2015-05-30)回复
  10. 5美元一月可以买KVM的啦!
    厘米2年前 (2015-05-28)回复
  11. 很好的vps啊。。。。
    海水2年前 (2015-05-27)回复
  12. 有xen就好了
    DU2年前 (2015-05-26)回复
  13. 搭建shadowsocks速度是关键
    夜曦2年前 (2015-05-26)回复